Hi, all,
Maybe it's a quite stupid question or is an already-asked question. But I promise that I get something new. According to the link http://www.datatables.net/blog/Twitter_Bootstrap_2 and the example http://www.datatables.net/media/blog/bootstrap_2/
We can see only DT_bootstrap.css is included, not the original css file of DataTables. However, using Firebug, we can see the generated html where there is a div whose css class is <b>datatables_Wrapper</b>. But there is no such css class definition, which only exists in the non-included css file <b>jquery.dataTables.css</b>. So my question is whether we should include the original css file of DataTables, or it's a mistake for the example.
Best wishes,
Arthur
Maybe it's a quite stupid question or is an already-asked question. But I promise that I get something new. According to the link http://www.datatables.net/blog/Twitter_Bootstrap_2 and the example http://www.datatables.net/media/blog/bootstrap_2/
We can see only DT_bootstrap.css is included, not the original css file of DataTables. However, using Firebug, we can see the generated html where there is a div whose css class is <b>datatables_Wrapper</b>. But there is no such css class definition, which only exists in the non-included css file <b>jquery.dataTables.css</b>. So my question is whether we should include the original css file of DataTables, or it's a mistake for the example.
Best wishes,
Arthur